Chapter 6-2: Prout Village / Sustainable Society Prout Village Third Edition

 

○Bridges

In a Municipality, bridges longer than 10 meters are basically constructed as wooden arch types with stone masonry; concrete is not used.

Item

Wooden Arch Bridge

Wooden Horizontal Bridge (Beam Bridge)

Foundation structure

Stone masonry piers + foundation resisting horizontal pressure required

Stone masonry piers suffice; load mainly vertical

Bridge structural form

Wood assembled in curved arch shape to distribute pressure to piers

Simple structure with straight wooden beams

Load capacity

High (distributes compressive force, suitable for vehicle traffic)

Medium to low (mainly short-span pedestrian use)

Span (bridge length)

Medium to long (possible 10–30 m or longer)

Short distance (realistically about 5–10 m)

Number of piers

Few needed (longer spans)

Many needed (cannot extend span length)

Required technology / construction difficulty

High (requires joints, curved wood, mechanical calculation)

Low to medium (assembly of straight members only)

Maintenance

Requires regular inspection; high strength and durability

Easier to replace parts; prone to deflection and decay sooner

Scenic / cultural value

High (traditional construction method, symbolic structure)

Practical and simple; somewhat plain visually

Main materials

Local wood (Hinoki cypress, cedar, etc.) + stone masonry

Local wood (cedar, pine, etc.) + stone masonry

Suitable terrain conditions

Both banks with height differences or solid bedrock river

Stable banks with narrow river width

Examples

Kintai Bridge (Yamaguchi), Saruhashi (Yamanashi)

Many village road pedestrian bridges over small streams



○Nomination Election (Municipality)

In a Prout Village, Leaders are chosen based on sincerity. This ensures that war does not occur, corruption is avoided, and decisions are made considering the common good. Conversely, if an insincere Leader is chosen, conflicts, corruption, and selfish decisions become prevalent.


This sincerity is closely related to the human Ego. The Ego is the concept of “the self,” and the stronger the “self,” the more a person tends toward insincerity. This is because asserting “the self” leads to prioritizing oneself. A sincere person can suppress this “self” and prioritize others instead—that is, someone who genuinely wishes for the happiness of others. To eliminate war and corruption from the world, it is essential at every leadership level to choose sincere people as Leaders.


The following table shows the criteria for good and bad Leaders. In society, there are people whose sincerity naturally shines through or whose sincere words and actions might not be apparent on the surface but exist nonetheless. On the other hand, there are those whose insincerity is visible in their attitudes and behavior. Most people fall somewhere in between these extremes, showing intermediate personality tendencies. This Nomination Election enables residents to recommend sincere or nearly sincere people as Leaders from among those around them, thus building a truly peaceful society.


Criteria for Good Leaders

Good Leader

Middle Layer

Bad Leader

Good Leader


Bad Leader

Ego light / Modest


Ego heavy / Strong

Honest


Dishonest / Insincere

Person of character


Hypocrite

Selfless


Greedy

Others-first


Self-centered

Calm


Intimidating / Overbearing

Non-aggressive


Aggressive

Non-violent


Violent

Harmonious


Destructive

Empathetic


Insensitive

Forgiving


Retaliatory

Broad-minded


Narrow-minded

Big-hearted


Small-minded

Does not eliminate those who oppose the self; seeks dialogue and understanding


Eliminates, fires, or attacks those who oppose the self

Treats everyone fairly


Sycophantic to superiors, domineering to subordinates

Compassionate by nature


Bullying by nature

Honest / Straightforward


Stubborn

Transparent and fair


Liar

Words and actions align


Words and actions do not align

Kind


Cold

Truly a good person inside


Appears good or respectable only on the surface

Values inner qualities


Values outward appearance

Unpretentious


Showy / Vanity

Humble


Loves power and titles

Win-win


Win-lose

Prioritizes others


Self-first

Gives first


Takes first

Thanks everyone


Thanks to self

Deep thinker


Shallow thinker


When a person is elected as a politician in a monetary society, they gain rewards and status that please the Ego, such as power, privileges, social status, influence, fame, and high salaries. This creates a system that tends to attract people with strong, dishonest Egοs. As the number of dishonest people increases, the transparency and fairness of elections decline, and fraudulent elections become more common.


One benchmark is the 2024 Corruption Perceptions Index published by the international NGO Transparency International. This index quantifies how much corruption is perceived in governments and public institutions based on opinions from experts and business people. The global average score is 43 out of 100. Among 180 countries, about two-thirds (120 countries) score below 50, indicating that corruption remains a serious issue. Denmark ranks first with 90 points, Japan is 20th with 71 points, and South Sudan is last with 8 points.


The main reasons these problems occur are as follows:


・It is a monetary society. In other words, the rewards of power, privilege, and high income gained by becoming a politician tend to attract people with strong Egos, and voters must choose from among such candidates.

・Voters do not deeply recognize that the strength or lightness of Ego is a decisive factor determining candidates’ words and actions.

・The election system itself is not designed to identify the strength of a candidate’s Ego (= personality).

・Voters lack unified criteria and values regarding Ego when selecting Leaders.


In Prout Village, to solve these issues, Nomination Elections are conducted to select persons of character. In schools or workplaces, after regularly seeing the same people in the same organization for about a year, various personalities become apparent, and the general evaluation by those around tends to be similar. In other words, people observe others’ words and actions closely. For example: “Person A is kind and cooperative with everyone,” “Person B is talkative and funny but somewhat cunning,” “Person C always talks behind friends’ backs,” “Person D is shy but serious and proceeds at their own pace without being swayed.” Such evaluations are possible regardless of academic ability and can be made even by 13-year-olds.

In other words, from the daily life around one’s own residence, a person is recommended by others. The person with the most recommendations becomes the 5th Leader of the Municipality (5th Community). Then, through successive stages, the selected 5th Leader can become the 1st Leader, who participates in the Prefectural Parliament where all Prefectural Leaders gather.


Also, by residents performing the necessary Duty Share for Municipality management, the personalities of people working together, like in a workplace, become apparent. Therefore, before the Nomination Election, a survey asking “Who do you recommend as an honest person?” is conducted. Those who receive high evaluations are announced within their Municipality (5th Community), and residents use this as a reference for their recommendations.


The role of the Municipality includes, for example, if a problem arises nearby, residents consult the 5th Leader or 5th Deputy Leader of the Municipality (5th Community). If necessary, the 5th Leader gathers neighboring residents to seek resolution through dialogue. If the issue remains unresolved, they escalate it to the 4th Leader in the next higher community level, aiming to resolve the matter through dialogue as a larger issue. In this way, problems are solved through dialogue, and each Leader gains experience in smaller organizations, growing into a 1st Leader. In such cases, when facing problems without clear answers, the true capability of the Leader and Deputy Leader becomes apparent.


This Nomination Election system is conducted under the same rules from Municipality level up to the World Federation.


Nomination Election Rules

Item

Content

Recommendation Criteria

- First, select people of honest character- Among them, choose those who have ability and can achieve results

Voter Prompt

"Please recommend someone around you who is honest both in appearance and in private, and can act for the benefit of everyone."

Eligible Groups for Recommendation

- Group A: Women, lesbians, feminine-identifying individuals- Group B: Men, gay, masculine-identifying individuals※ Non-binary, questioning, X-gender, transgender, etc. can freely choose the group (A or B) closest to their gender identity

Recommendation Order

- Recommenders alternate recommendations from Group A and Group B- Leaders and Deputy Leaders alternate between Group A and Group B

Recommender Requirements

- Only residents aged 10 or older can recommend- Recommenders must have lived in the community for at least 1 year

Municipality Duty

- Unless there are special circumstances, the municipality must ask all residents aged 10 or older for recommendations

Leader Recommendation Rights

- Each Leader has the right to recommend for their “responsible organization” and for the “Municipality (5th Community)”

Nomination Election Flow

- Nomination elections start from the World Federation, then proceed in order: Six Continents → Country → Prefecture → Municipality. If a vacancy occurs in a higher-level organization, Leaders from lower-level organizations move up to fill it.- Residents in a circular housing area recommend one person each.- When a lower-level organization loses a Leader to a higher level, a new Leader is elected at that time.- Alternating selection from Group A and B occurs from the World Federation down to municipalities.- The global female-to-male ratio is roughly balanced.

Election Frequency

- Once per year, on the designated nomination election day

Decision Authority

- Final decision authority rests with the Leader- In absence of the Leader, the Deputy Leader acts in place

Deputy Leader Authority

- If the Deputy Leader judges the Leader’s actions as self-serving or abusive, they can conduct a nomination election once a year in their organization or parliament

Specialized 3 Departments (Coordination, Medical/Food, Manufacturing)

- Members with high expertise and honesty are discussed and nominated in Municipality (1st Community)- 1st Leader has the right to request nominations

Principle of Meeting Participation

- Leaders and Deputy Leaders participate in pairs in World Parliament, Continental Parliament, Country Parliament, Prefecture Parliament, and Municipality (1st–5th Community)

Continuation of Leader/Deputy Leader

- If re-elected, the role continues- Those unfit or greedy are removed after 1 year

Filling Vacancies

1. If a Leader is removed/retired → Deputy Leader automatically promoted2. Vacant positions are filled by Leaders or Deputy Leaders from the next lower tier3. Groups A and B alternate with each replacement

Handling Long-Term Absence

- Long-term absence due to injury, pregnancy, etc. → appoint a temporary replacement- Upon return, if the position is vacant, the original Leader can resume

Rules for Returning to Office

- A Leader who lost their position can be re-nominated and participate from Municipality (5th Community)- This promotes generational turnover and organizational renewal


One reason for holding a Nomination Election once per year is to prevent residents from becoming indifferent to elections. Another reason is that even if a person is selected based on honesty, some aspects of their character may not be visible in everyday life. When they gain actual power or a position of authority, their true nature may be revealed. By having an annual election day, it becomes easy to make leadership changes if necessary.

The right to recommend starts at age 10, and unless there are special circumstances, the municipality must ask every resident for recommendations. This age is considered sufficient for children to express their own will, and it is also an easy-to-understand milestone in life.

Although all residents have the right to recommend, they must have lived in the area for at least one year. The reason is to avoid situations where someone who has just moved in, and has not met most residents of the five communities, recommends without sufficient knowledge.

In addition, in the municipalities or parliaments, the Leader and Deputy Leader act together. The final decision authority rests with the Leader, but to prevent unilateral action or abuse of power, it is assumed that decisions are always discussed thoroughly with the Deputy Leader beforehand. To ensure this system is not merely symbolic, the Deputy Leader has the right to hold a Nomination Election once per year in their municipality or parliament, which determines whether the Leader continues in their role. The details are summarized in the table below.

Rules for Leaders and Deputy Leaders

Item

Content

Key Points

Basic Condition

Before making decisions, the Leader must discuss thoroughly with the Deputy Leader and aim for mutual agreement.

Discussion is a prerequisite.

Final Decision Authority

Even if the Deputy Leader is not fully convinced after listening to the Leader, the Leader holds the final decision authority to prevent delays and ensure smooth organizational operation.

Prevents stagnation in organizational management.

Ideal Process

1. Discuss thoroughly and aim for mutual understanding.2. Even if agreement is not reached, acknowledge that discussion occurred.3. Continue this process consistently.

Thorough discussion is key to building trust.

Evaluation Points

Honest Leader: Respects the Deputy Leader’s opinion, engages in full discussion, listens carefully, and can clearly explain necessary decisions even if they are inconvenient for residents.Dishonest Leader: Acts unilaterally, disregards the Deputy Leader’s opinions, and may neglect explanations to the Deputy Leader or residents if there are guilty motives.

Even if members’ opinions are not adopted, honest listening builds trust among the members.

Deputy Leader Authority

If the Deputy Leader continuously judges the Leader’s actions as abuse of power, they discuss with the municipality or parliament members and monitor the Leader’s behavior. They also have the right to hold a Nomination Election once per year to reconsider leadership.

Prevents abuse of power at an early stage.

Misunderstandings Due to Comprehension Differences

If the Deputy Leader has low understanding, they may misinterpret the Leader’s intentions and perceive abuse of power even if none exists. Municipality members need to check the Leader’s behavior with this in mind.

Risk of misjudgment; careful observation is required.




○Nomination Election (Prefecture, Country, Six Continents, World Federation)


Choosing sincere leaders within municipalities forms the foundation of all governance. The Municipality (1st Community) Leader participates next in the Prefectural Parliament.


In Japan in 2000, there were 47 prefectures, so there would be 47 Prefectural Leaders and 47 Prefectural Deputy Leaders. From these 94 individuals, the National Parliament holds Nomination Elections to select the National Leader and National Deputy Leader of Japan, who then participate in the Six Continents Continental Parliament.


By the year 2000, there were approximately 200 countries worldwide. Thus, there are about 200 National Leaders and 200 National Deputy Leaders. Among them, each National Leader participates in a Nomination Election within their own continent of the Six Continents to select a Continental Leader and Continental Deputy Leader. These two then participate in the World Federation World Parliament. The Six Continents are: (1) Oceania, (2) Asia, (3) Europe, (4) Africa, (5) North America, and (6) South America. Antarctica is excluded as it has no permanent residents.


Thus, a total of 12 Continental Leaders and Continental Deputy Leaders—two from each of the Six Continents—participate in the World Federation World Parliament. Afterwards, a Nomination Election is held within the World Parliament to decide the World Leader and World Deputy Leader. Here again, members from Group A and Group B are selected alternately.


Currently, the World Federation’s operational organization consists of three sectors: General Administration, Medical & Food, and Manufacturing. Although the number of these sectors may increase in the future, if the World Federation starts with this structure, the Leaders and Deputy Leaders of these three sectors will be discussed and decided within the World Parliament based on who is sincere and capable, just as in municipalities and Prefectural Parliaments. Ultimately, the World Leader holds the right to appoint them.


In this way, from the Municipality (5th Community) up to the World Federation World Parliament, the operational and Nomination Election system is the same. Through nine levels of Nomination Elections—from Municipality (5th Community), (4th Community), (3rd Community), (2nd Community), (1st Community), Prefectural Parliament, National Parliament, Continental Parliament, to World Parliament—the World Leader of the World Federation is chosen.


In monetary societies’ political systems, power is often divided among legislative, judicial, and executive branches. However, the World Federation does not disperse power. What should be understood here is that the Continental Leaders participating in the World Federation are sincere and virtuous individuals selected from municipalities. In other words, the World Federation is a gathering of virtuous people, and virtuous people do not abuse power. Residents who nominate leaders must be careful not to recommend those who might misuse power.


Also, since it is premised that many problems are resolved at the municipal level, the issues addressed at the World Federation level are limited.


○Duty Share System

“Duty” carries the nuance of a social and moral “role to be fulfilled,” while “Share” means to share or distribute. Since the operation of municipalities is carried out by residents, basic living infrastructure such as medical care, food, housing, water and electricity infrastructure, education, clothing, and security maintenance must be managed on a rotating basis among residents.

Some residents actively and seriously participate, while others do not participate at all. Therefore, participation is not voluntary but recorded to ensure fair and equal time commitment. Currently, the guideline is about 2 hours per day or roughly 8 hours per week.

The tasks include the following:

Field

Specific Task Examples

Leader Positions

Leader positions at all levels from the World Federation (World Parliament) down to Municipality

Life Infrastructure

Inspection of water supply facilities, cleaning of small hydro/ wind power systems, simple checking of pipes and wiring

Maintenance

Repairs at community centers, painting, organizing tool storage

Housing Construction

Construction and repair of housing

Roads & Civil Engineering

Road maintenance, digging and cleaning of rainwater drainage ditches

Agriculture & Environment

Weeding and harvesting in communal gardens, compost production, cutting and bundling bamboo/straw materials, tree planting

Recycling

Management of resource separation stations, compost management

Manufacturing Unit

Adjustment of machinery and equipment

Educational Support

Children’s learning support, reading sessions, workshop instruction

Mutual Aid Services

Firefighting, assisting event operations, guiding visitors

Medical & Welfare

Nursing care, dementia care, management of Rehabilitation Facility

IT & Administration

Community network maintenance, PC troubleshooting, energy and water usage data aggregation


Since this community work targets basic living infrastructure, cultural activities such as music, arts, or sports team coaching are not included in Duty Share.


In Prout Village, Nomination Elections become possible from age 10. Correspondingly, simple Duty Share activities also start from age 10. Because Duty Share has an aspect of occupational experience necessary for municipal operation, it offers a broad range of experiences and an opportunity to understand the overall picture required for administration.


コメントを投稿

0 コメント